INTERNATIONAL
DIRECTIVE TO BAN GEO-ENGINEERING
NOTICE TO AGENT IS
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL AND NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT ALL APPLIES
NOTICE TO CEASE AND
DESIST ALL WEATHER MODIFICATION, GEO-ENGINEERING, STRATOSPHERIC AEROSOL
INJECTION AND SOLAR RADIATION MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS AND PROGRAMMES
TO ALL AND WHOMSOEVER
IT APPLIES
This is a Notice.
It is a Lawful Notice. It
informs you and it means what it says. It is not a letter and it should not be
treated as such.
We the living,
breathing, natural, men and women, peacefully inhabiting the land mass commonly
known as the United Kingdom hereby declare and hold these truths to be self
evident. All living, breathing, natural, men and women are born equal and
endowed with certain inalienable birthrights as given to us by God, the creator
or source. As the maxim in law holds, “Equality before the law is paramount and
mandatory” and as such we understand our birth rights cannot be taken
away or removed without our consent.
Amongst these but not limited to them is the right to life, liberty, the
pursuit of happiness and the security of all living, breathing, natural, men
and women.
The
Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares in Article 1 “All
human beings are born free and equal,
in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should
act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood”
and it is from this perspective and understanding we direct you to cease and
desist the geo-engineering, stratospheric aerosol injection and solar radiation
management applications and programmes, currently being used for and with the
expressed intent of modifying the weather.
The 1st
edition of Black’s Law Dictionary notes; “Person, a man considered according to the
rank he holds in society, with all the rights to which the place he holds
entitles him, and the duties which it imposes” 1 Bouv. Inst. No. 137. “A human
being considered as capable of having rights and of being charged with duties;
while a “thing” is an object over which rights may be exercised.
Persons
are divided by law into natural and artificial. Natural persons are such as the
God of nature formed us; artificial are such as are created and devised by
human laws, for the purposes of society and government, which are called
“corporations” or “bodies politic”. 1 Bl. Comm. 123
Whereas it
is our understanding living, breathing, natural, men and women are sovereign,
being second only to God, the creator or source. All else including governments
are corporate legal fictions, bodies politic or artificial persons. As the following
maxims in law state, “The law gives rise to fictions, not
fictions to law” and “Where truth is, fictions of law does not exist”
Whereas it
is our understanding, living, breathing, natural, men and women constitute a vast
percentage of the earth’s common wealth and understand ourselves to be one of
its most valuable resources.
Whereas it is our understanding the land mass
commonly known as the United Kingdom is a common law jurisdiction with this
being the foundation of the system of law in place in many countries, as
evidenced by President Obama’s address to the Palace of Westminster wherein he
stated “What began on this island would inspire millions, throughout the
continent of Europe and across the world. But perhaps no one drew greater
inspiration, from these notions of freedom than your rabble rousing colonists
on the other side of the Atlantic. As Winston Churchill said, the Magna Carta,
the Bill of Rights, Habeas Corpus, trial by jury and English Common Law find
their most famous expression in the American Declaration of Independence”
http://www.newstatesman.com/2011/05/nations-rights-world-united?fb_action_ids=1266706
87509103&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=246965925417366
Moreover, Ann
Bressington, Honourable and Independent Member of the Legislative Council of
South Australia reminded her audience of the importance of common law in her
address advising of the imposition of the United Nations agenda, commonly known
and understood to be Agenda 21/30. Transcript of speech http://lybio.net/ann-bressington-exposes-agenda-21-the-united-nations-club-of-rome/news-politics/
and here on video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sES6_OXPwOU
Whilst Sir Edward Coke
1552 – 1634 stated “Reason is the life of the law; nay the common law itself is nothing
but reason. The law which is perfection of reason”
Whereas it is our
understanding, whilst our constitution is largely unwritten, it is best
understood and interpreted as living and flexible and can be found in the
customs and traditions of common law. With these principles being found and
recorded in the some of the following documents namely Magna Carta of 1215 and
1297, the Petition of Right 1627, the Declaration and Bill of Rights of 1688,
Habeas Corpus Acts of 1640 and 1679 and the Writ of Habeas Corpus of 1816. Within
these documents are contained some of the following, the right to trial by
jury, the right of petition, the right of free speech and movement and the unalienable
right to govern and police ourselves commensurate with and adhering to the
customs, principles and traditions of common law.
As the most senior judge in
the United Kingdom the Lord Chief Justice stated “Courts should use more English
common law in their decisions” http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/7545164/Lord-Chief-Justice-says-courts-should-use-more-English-common-law-in-their-decisions.html
Whereas it is our
understanding common law principles are thus; “Do not commit harm, injury, loss
or fraud and do not breach the peace”
Whereas it is our
understanding in standing under the principles of common law this is in keeping
with the laws of God, the creator or source.
Whereas it is our understanding the
UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION PLC is an entirely different entity to the land mass
commonly known as the United Kingdom and is administered and operates under the
jurisdiction of maritime/admiralty law and functions pursuant to statutes and
acts. Acts are commonly understood to be acts of parliament and statutes are
understood to be the legislated rules of a society. This society is commonly
known and understood to be the law society.
Whereas it is our
understanding the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION PLC is administered and operates, for
and under the motive of generating profits for those who claim ownership of the
UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION PLC.
Whereas it is our
understanding the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION PLC is owned by the crown this
being the Crown Corporation based in the square mile of the City of London http://openeye.99k.org/The%20Crown.html
Whereas it is our
understanding the City of London is a separate city state operating
independently from the land mass commonly known as the United Kingdom.
Whereas it is our
understanding the City of London, The District of Columbia and Vatican City are
all designated as independent and separate city states and are therefore not subject
to jurisdiction as laid down by legal and statutory instruments. The following
link provides further information regarding the three independent city states, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLGzreJguBI
Whereas it is our
understanding acts are given the colour of law and statutes are given the force
of law only with and by the consent of the governed.
Black’s Law Dictionary 1st
Edition defines colour and force thus “color” an appearance, semblance, or
simulacrum as distinguished from that which is real. A prima facie or apparent
right, hence, a deceptive appearance; a plausible assumed exterior, concealing
a lack of reality; a disguise, pretext” Force is defined thus “Power
dynamically considered, that is, in motion or in action; constraining power,
compulsion; strength directed to an end. Usually the word occurs in such
connections as to show that unlawful or wrongful action is meant”
Whereas it is our
understanding government has the power and duty to create “laws” in the form of acts
and statutes, commonly understood to be legislation, with the intention of
regulating commerce, given the profit motive of commerce has the potential to commit
harm, injury, loss, and fraud against and towards living, breathing, natural,
men and women.
Whereas it is our
understanding the government derives its power from the consent of the governed
and without the aforementioned consent the government has no power.
Whereas it is our
understanding members of parliament are in office to serve and not to rule.
Whereas it is our
understanding we are not juristic persons defined in Black’s Law Dictionary 1st
Edition as “pertaining or belonging to, or characteristic of, jurisprudence, or a
jurist, or the legal profession”
Whereas it is our
understanding we are not corporate legal fictions. Corporate being defined in
Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition thus “Belonging to a corporation; as a corporate
name. Incorporated; as a corporate body”
Whereas it is our
understanding the government is “de
facto” rather than de jure.
Whereas it is our understanding a “de facto” government is one which
operates and exercises power and control. Black’s Law Dictionary 1st
Edition defines a government “de facto”
thus “a
government of fact. A government actually exercising power and control in the
state; as opposed to the true and lawful government; not established according
to the constitution or not lawfully entitled to recognition or supremacy, but
which has nevertheless supplanted or displaced the government de jure” “A
government deemed unlawful, or deemed wrongful or unjust, which nevertheless,
receives presently habitual obedience from the bulk of the community” Aust.
Jur. 324.
Whereas it is our
understanding a “de jure” government
operates according to principles of fairness, right and justice. Black’s Law
Dictionary 1st Edition defines a government “de jure” thus “A government of right; the true and
lawful government; a government established according to the constitution of
the state, and lawfully entitled to recognition and supremacy and the administration
of the state, but which is actually cut off from power and control. A
government deemed lawful, or deemed rightful or just, which nevertheless has
been supplanted or displaced; that is to say, which receives not presently
(although it received formerly) habitual obedience from the bulk of the
community” Aust. Jur.324.
Whereas it is our
understanding, under common law, everyone is held individually responsible for
their actions irrespective of the authority, office or position they may hold.
Whereas it is our
understanding members of parliament swear upon their oath of office to serve
Elizabeth 11 of the House of Windsor. http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/elections-and-voting/swearingin/
Whereas it is our
understanding Elizabeth 11 of the House of Windsor swore upon her coronation
oath to uphold the laws of God, the creator or source as evidenced herein; http://jahtruth.net/signed-o.jpg
Whereas it is our
understanding this relationship is based upon the trust given to Elizabeth 11
of the House of Windsor from the living, breathing, natural, men and women
peacefully inhabiting the land mass commonly known as the United Kingdom.
Whereas it is our
understanding Elizabeth 11 of the House of Windsor rules pursuant to the claim
of the “divine right of kings”
Whereas it is our
understanding the concept of the “divine right of kings” is an 18th
century political theory. Black’s Law Dictionary, 10th Edition.
Whereas it is our
understanding under common law to allow or acquiesce to weather modification,
geo-engineering, solar radiation management and stratospheric aerosol injection
applications and programmes is to commit harm, injury and loss, human against
human, thereby constituting the civil crime of tort.
Whereas it is our understanding actions and decisions taken
by members of parliament to support the aforementioned applications and
programmes without giving full disclosure, full terms and conditions, equal
consideration and in not obtaining either consent or permission, are in
actuality operating in breach of their sworn oaths of office and the trust
relationship invested in them by those who finance their positions, being the
living, breathing, natural, men and women. As the maxim
in law states “Contractus ex turpi caus, vel contr bonos mores nullus est”
meaning, a contract founded on a base and unlawful consideration, or against
good morals, is null, Hob 167, Dig, 2, 4, 14, 27.
Whereas it is our
understanding members of parliament draw a salary from the taxes levied against
and discharged through the sweat equity of living, breathing, natural, men and
women.
Whereas it is our
understanding that everyone, everywhere and at all times are subject to common
law irrespective or regardless of the position or office they inhabit.
Whereas it is our
understanding the claim of “Just following orders” is “No
defence” as established by the principle adopted by the Nuremberg
Trials at the Geneva Convention, mirroring the maxim in law which states “Ignorance
of the law does not excuse you of the law”
Whereas it is our
understanding, the aforementioned applications and programmes will be claimed
to be “legal” it is our understanding as the maxim in law states “Legality
is not reality”
Whereas it is our
understanding weather modification, geo-engineering, solar radiation management
and stratospheric aerosol injection applications and programmes are being
conducted as evidenced by the Directive to MP’s to Ban Geo-Engineering and the
House of Commons Science and Technology Committees report on: The Regulation of
Geo-Engineering and the Solar Radiation Management technique known as
Stratospheric Aerosol Geo-Engineering, without either being fully informed and
without our permission and consent either being sought or given.
Whereas it is our
understanding that despite expressing concerns to individual members of
parliament, general practitioners and others in positions of authority. Responses
have included stonewalling, denial and a complete dismissal of those expressed
concerns, into what amounts to and constitutes a direct breach of common law
whereby all are subject to the principle of “Do no harm, cause no injury or
loss and do not commit fraud” Whereas it is our understanding as the
maxim in law holds “He does not speak the truth is a traitor to the truth”
Whereas it is our
understanding general practitioners swear upon their Hippocratic Oath to
exhibit a duty of care towards living, breathing, natural, men and women. In
denying or obfuscating the true health impacts of these applications and programmes
upon their patients they therefore place themselves in breach of their
Hippocratic Oath, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath
As can be seen, one
version of the oath declares “I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit
of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm
and injustice. I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it,
nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to a
woman an abortive remedy. In purity and holiness I will guard my life and my
art.
I will not use the knife, not
even on sufferers from stone, but will withdraw in favour of such men as are
engaged in this work. Whatever houses I may visit, I will come for the benefit
of the sick, remaining free of intentional injustice, of all mischief and in
particular of sexual relations with both female and male persons, be they free
or slaves”
Whilst another version
declares in part “I will prescribe regimens for the good of my patients according to my
ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone. In every house where I
come I will enter only for the good of my patients, keeping myself far from all
intentional ill-doing and all seduction and especially from the pleasures of
love with women or men be they free or slaves”
Whereas it is commonly presumed
and understood, general and medical practitioners and other health care
professionals, adhere to the principle of “Primum non nocere” meaning to do no
harm.
We hereby understand and
declare them to be in breach and contempt of their Hippocratic Oath which they
took and swore to uphold. We further hold them guilty of misconduct/misfeasance
in public office as do we, all public servants who through their actions
whether committed by omission or commission are not serving the living,
breathing, natural, men and women according to their respective and sworn oaths
of office and are therefore operating in breach of the trust invested in them.
The House of Commons
Library report of October 2009 gives the historical background to the offence
of misconduct in public office and provides a summary of the principles of the
offence as it stands today wherein it states thus “The elements of misconduct in
public office”
a) A public officer acting as such
b) Wilfully neglects to perform his duty and/or wilfully misconducts
himself
c) To such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in
the office holder
d) Without reasonable cause or justification
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/briefings/snpc-04909.pdf
Claims of ignorance,
denial and stonewalling are intolerable and in contradiction to the information
contained within the 1978 Environmental Modification Act or ENMOD as referenced
in the Directive.
Again as the following maxims
in law state “Ignorance of the law does not excuse you of the law” and
“He does not speak the truth is a traitor to the truth”
As the study conducted
and published in July 2010 by the United States Accountability Office stated “Not one
geo-engineering technique is safe and their implementation could cause more
damage than the supposed catastrophes they are intended to avoid” the
report states in conclusion “climate change technologies do not now
offer a viable response to global climate change”
Whereas it is our
understanding hiding behind the Official Secrets Act and raising the cry of “National
security”
is in effect code for “Corporate and governmental security” and a call for the
continuance of these programmes, activities and schemes without either
permission or consent being sought or given by living, breathing natural, men
and women, whom have been financing the aforementioned programmes, activities
and schemes via duplicitous and illicit taxation imposed under the false paradigm
of human-made, CO2-induced global warming.
Whereas it is our
understanding members of parliament and others inhabiting and acting in
positions of authority are in reality, acting in the capacity of official and
illicit gatekeepers and in direct contravention to their duty of care, and not
in the best interests of the welfare, health and safety of all living,
breathing, natural, men and women. Despite being entrusted with the
responsibility of properly representing their views and wishes and of being
paid by them. Thereby acting in breach of the common law principles of “Do
no harm, cause no injury or loss and do not commit fraud”
Whereas it is our
understanding members of parliament are operating in breach of the code of
conduct applicable to them and in so doing undermine the trust the public have
invested in them.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmcode/1885/188502.htm
This also signals a
breach of the duty of care applicable to and upon all living, breathing,
natural, men and women whom as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
declares “Should act towards each other in the spirit of brotherhood”
The directive notes the view of the public, which was not “supportive”
when consulted regarding the project called (SPICE) conducted by the
Stratospheric Injection for Climate Engineering using the technique called
Solar Radiation Management (SRM) Wherein it was proposed that “water”
should be “sprayed into the atmosphere” The Directive quotes Dr Ilya Sandra
Perlingieri who stated “No permission regarding weather
modification has ever been requested of the public therefore no permission has
ever been given in any country. So no organisation nor government nor private
individual has the legal right to be doing this – yet this has gone ahead
anyway – and therefore is a violation of human rights”
This again signals a
breach of common law, whereby all are admonished to not cause harm, injury or loss,
breach the peace or commit fraud and is in direct contravention of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights wherein it declares in Article 5;
“No-one shall be subjected to
torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”
Whilst the Charter of
Fundamental Rights of the European Union declares in
Article 1“Human
dignity is inviolable. It must be respected and protected”
Article 2 part 1 declares
“Everyone
has the right to life” whilst
Article 3 part 1 declares “Everyone
has the right to respect for his or her physical and mental integrity”
Whilst the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights Article 25 declares
(1) “Everyone has the right to a
standard of living adequate for the health and wellbeing of himself and of his
family, including food, clothing, housing, and medical care and necessary
social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment,
sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in
circumstances beyond his control”
(2)” Motherhood and childhood are
entitled to special care and assistance. All children whether born in or out of
wedlock, shall enjoy the same protection”
Article 30 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights goes on meanwhile to declare “Nothing
in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group, or
person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the
destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein”
Whereas it is our
understanding, full disclosure, terms and conditions and equal consideration
have not been offered or provided to the living, breathing, natural, men and
women regarding the aforementioned applications and programmes and we hereby rebut
the presumption our permission and consent have therefore been given.
If it is claimed
permission and consent has been obtained, we hereby rebut this presumption and
further if consent and permission have been gained, via deception and a lack of
knowledge and understanding of the principle of “tacit acquiescence”
Although consent and
permission may be claimed to have been given via “tacit acquiescence” this
is undermined by those in positions of authority whom routinely deny, discredit
and dismiss the concerns of living, breathing, natural, men and women, when
approached and giving voice to their concerns regarding weather modification, geo-engineering,
stratospheric aerosol injection and solar radiation management applications and
programmes.
Whereas it is our
understanding our permission and consent has neither been sought nor given to weather
modification, geo-engineering, solar radiation management and stratospheric
aerosol injection applications and programmes.
However from our
understanding and as the Directive makes clear “public awareness of SAG has
been
deliberately suppressed and now manipulated” The Directive goes on to quote
from the recorded notes of the Royal Society funded Solar Radiation Governance
Initiative (SRMGI) wherein it stated “Involve general public because a) they pay
for it, b) they have the power to stop it. Keep them informed on what GE
(geo-engineering) is for but don’t necessarily ask their permission”
Whereas it is our
understanding this statement in itself constitutes an act of Mens Rea
the meaning of which in Latin is “guilty mind” from Black’s
Law Dictionary 1st Edition wherein it states “A guilty mind; a guilty or
wrongful purpose; a criminal intent”
Whereas it our understanding institutions such as the Royal
Society, various other think tanks and non-governmental organisations operate
according to Chatham House Rules. The Chatham House Rule was devised in 1927
being further refined in both 1992 and 2002 respectively.
The rule is as follows “When a meeting, or part thereof,
is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the
information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the
speaker(s) nor that of any other participant may be revealed”
From our understanding
this stance signals the deliberate intention of keeping information from the
awareness of living, breathing, natural, men and women with the purpose and
affect of keeping them deluded, ignorant and manipulated and we hold this to be
a further example of Mens Rea.
Whereas it is our
understanding Pope Boniface issued the papal bull of 1302 titled Unum Sanctum
wherein it alleged and claimed; ”Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we
define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature
be subject to the Roman Pontiff”
Whereas it is our
understanding according to the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666 living, breathing,
natural, men and women were deemed as lost or abandoned at sea. Therein providing
the government/state with the opportunity to claim ownership and title over the
land mass commonly known as the United Kingdom, the common wealth and material
resources of the land mass commonly known as the United Kingdom and over the lives
of all living, breathing, natural, men and women in perpetuity. The stipulation
being living, breathing, natural, men and women as created by God, creator or
source had until the age of seven to claim their share of the common wealth,
land and material resources of the land mass commonly known as the United
Kingdom.
Whereas it is our
understanding the 1302 papal bull of Pope Boniface and the Cestui Que Vie Act
of 1666 have never been fully disclosed, the equal consideration of the parties
involved have not been taken into account and further the full terms and
conditions of both the papal bull Unum Sanctum 1302 and the Cestui Que Vie Act
of 1666 have been kept and deliberately concealed from the awareness of living,
breathing, natural, men and women, into what amounts to, from our
understanding, as committing, fraud, harm, injury and loss. As the maxim in law states “Contractus ex turpi caus, vel contr bonos
mores nullus est”
To operate without our
fully informed consent and permission constitutes fraud and is therefore a
breach of common law and the trust members of parliament and Elizabeth 11 of
the House of Windsor have received and have had invested in them. As the maxim
in law states a “Fraud revealed is null and void” nunc pro tunc
Whereas it is our
understanding we are “governed and policed by consent” as
stated implicitly in the address given to the nation by Theresa May acting in
her capacity as Home Secretary during the riots which occurred in August 2011.
As, Article 21 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights states
(1) “Everyone has the right to
take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen
representatives”
(2) “Everyone has the right of
equal access to public service in his country”
(3) “The will of the people shall
be the basis of the authority of government, this will, shall be expressed in
periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage
and shall be held by secret vote or equivalent free voting procedures”
Whereas we the living,
breathing, natural, men and women understand and hold fast to our understanding
of the principles as contained within and pursuant to the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court. Which is to allow or acquiesce to weather
modification, geo-engineering, stratospheric aerosol injection and solar
radiation management applications and programmes is to engage in and commit the
following crimes;
(a) The Crime of Genocide
(b) Crimes against Humanity
(c) War Crimes
(d) The Crime of Aggression
Article 6 of the Rome
Statute of the International Criminal Court defines Genocide thus;
“For the purpose of this Statute, “genocide” means any of the following
acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic,
racial or religious group, as such”
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated
to bring about its physical destruction in whole or part;
Article 7 of the Rome
Statute of the International Criminal Court defines Crimes against Humanity
thus; “For the purpose of this Statute, “crimes
against humanity” means any of the following acts when committed as part of a
widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with
knowledge of the attack”
(a) Murder;
(b) Extermination;
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collective on
political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in
paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognised as impermissible
under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this
paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing
great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:
(a) “Attack directed against any civilian population” means a course of
conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1
against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or
organisational policy to commit such attack;
(b) “Extermination” includes the intentional infliction of conditions
of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated
to bring about the destruction of part of a population;
Article 8 of the Rome
Statute of the International Criminal Court explains War Crimes as;
1. The Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in
particular when committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a
large-scale commission of such crimes.
2. For, the purposes of this Statute “war crimes” means:
(a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of the 12th
August 1949 namely any of the following acts against persons or property
protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention:
(i) Wilful killing;
(ii) Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;
(iii) Wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or
health.
Whereas it is our
understanding, previous and current government have also committed acts of
democide. Professor R.J.Rummel of the University of Hawaii explains democide as
the government committing acts of mass murder, genocide and politicide.
Whereas it is our
understanding living, breathing, natural, men and women, who constitute the government,
are guilty of the civil crime of tort and further are committing all of the
above crimes, whether by omission or commission, against all living, breathing,
natural, men and women via the commission of weather modification, geo-engineering,
stratospheric aerosol injection and solar radiation management applications and
programmes.
Whereas it
is our understanding individuals such as Bill Gates, Richard Branson, David
Keith and Ken Caldeira (as noted in the Directive) are involved in and
supporting (whether academically or financially) the ongoing weather
modification, geo-engineering, stratospheric aerosol injection and solar
radiation management applications and programmes. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/sep/13/geoengineering-coalition-world-climate
Whereas it is our
understanding as the Directive notes, “there has been a move away from conducting
research into the aforementioned applications and programmes to a move into
conducting and carrying out the applications and programmes in real time and
without the full knowledge of the effects of them” upon
living, breathing, natural, men and women and all other sentient life forms.
Whereas it is our
understanding as noted in the recent article published in Activist Post,
weather modification, geo-engineering, stratospheric aerosol injection and
solar radiation management applications and programmes, are being carried out in
many nations around the world.
Whereas it is our
understanding as the Directive makes clear, weather modification, geo-engineering,
stratospheric aerosol injection and solar radiation management applications and
programmes have the potential and are currently causing serious harm to the
health and welfare of all living, breathing, natural, men and women and all
other sentient life forms, peacefully inhabiting planet earth.
Whereas it is our
understanding a breach of common law and the trust relationship has occurred and
further it is our understanding no allegiance is therefore due and can no
longer be presumed without proper representation, accountability and
transparent governance. Further each and every living, breathing, natural, man
and woman acting in the capacity and role of governmental agents, have, whether
individually or collectively, committed the civil crime of tort and further
have also committed a breach of our inalienable, human rights and freedoms in
direct contradiction to their professed and alleged claims and sworn oaths of
office, and as such are liable to be proceeded against in a private capacity.
We the living, breathing,
natural, men and women hereby serve notice and demand the government and all
other bodies, authorities, groups and individuals whether publicly or privately
funded, cease and desist all weather modification, geo-engineering, solar
radiation management and stratospheric aerosol injection applications and
programmes and these applications and programmes are halted forthwith and with
immediate effect. Failure to do so will mean living, breathing, natural, men
and women withdrawing their consent to be policed and governed. And as such we
understand living, breathing, natural, men and women have the right to apply
for and pursue private criminal proceedings and or initiate class action
lawsuits and for these to be heard in a court of common law. We hereby notice pursuant
to article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 we the living, breathing, natural, men and
women have the inalienable right to engage in lawful rebellion until such time
as we receive remedy and redress.
We hereby serve notice
of withdrawal of our consent to all of the above and aforementioned geo-engineering,
stratospheric aerosol injection and solar radiation management and weather
modification applications and programmes.
All words and terms contained herein are those as understood by the
living, breathing, natural, men and women, peacefully inhabiting the land mass
commonly known as the United Kingdom.
All words and terms are as defined by the living, breathing, natural, men
and women.
All words and terms are subject to change only with the permission and consent
of the living, breathing, natural, men and women, peacefully inhabiting the
land mass commonly known as the United Kingdom.
This document remains now and henceforth the property of Beve: Hamilton©
All Rights Reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment